True or False: A safeguard is synonymous with an Independent Protection Layer, but not all safeguards are IPLs.

The statement is false. While a safeguard is indeed associated with the concept of independent protection layers (IPLs), the details of the definition highlight an important distinction. An independent protection layer refers specifically to safeguards that are not influenced by or dependent on the same cause as the initial hazard or risk being mitigated. This helps ensure that the failure of one layer does not imply the failure of another, providing a more robust approach to risk reduction.

However, not all safeguards qualify as IPLs because some may not meet the criteria for independence. For instance, a safeguard that is dependent on the same failure mechanism as the hazard it is intended to mitigate may still be a safeguard but does not provide the same level of effectiveness as an independent protection layer. Thus, the relationship between safeguards and IPLs is more nuanced than being strictly synonymous, leading to the conclusion that while both terms deal with risk management, they do not entirely overlap in definition or application.