True or False: The low frequency of Independent Protection Layer (IPL) activation means that consequence examination is usually unnecessary.

In the context of Layer of Protection Analysis (LOPA), the statement about the low frequency of Independent Protection Layer (IPL) activation suggests that because these layers are not frequently activated, examining potential consequences of their failure may not be necessary. However, this is not the case.

The need for consequence examination is crucial regardless of the frequency of IPL activation. IPLs are designed to prevent or mitigate hazardous events, and their effectiveness in achieving this goal must be evaluated independently of how often failures may occur. A low activation frequency can indicate that an IPL is functioning well, but it does not eliminate the potential for significant consequences, should an incident occur or the IPL fail.

Therefore, one must conduct a thorough consequence examination to understand the potential impacts fully and to ensure that the safety measures in place are adequate to protect against significant hazards. This examination is an essential part of the risk assessment process in LOPA.